International court examines faltering climate action

By Sara Schonhardt | 12/03/2024 06:11 AM EST

Judges in The Hague will hear from almost 100 countries before issuing a nonbinding decision about flailing government efforts to harness global temperatures.

Presiding Judge Nawaf Salam opens hearings at the World Court in The Hague.

Presiding Judge Nawaf Salam (fourth from right) opens hearings into what countries are legally required to do to combat climate change and help vulnerable nations fight it at the World Court in The Hague on Monday. Peter Dejong/AP

Small island nations that feel as if they got a bad deal at last month’s global climate talks hope the world’s highest court will treat them better.

The International Court of Justice in The Hague is being asked to determine the legal obligations that major polluting countries have for tackling climate change — and the consequences they face if they fail. The court opened two weeks of proceedings Monday to hear oral arguments from nearly 100 countries.

The hearings began eight days after the close of COP29 in Azerbaijan, where wealthy countries agreed to “take the lead” in providing poorer nations with $300 billion annually by 2035 to address rising temperatures.

Advertisement

Developing nations denounced the deal for falling short of what they need financially and for failing to include language to advance international efforts to stem the drivers of global warming. The legal hearings come amid growing skepticism about the effectiveness of the global talks.

GET FULL ACCESS