California governor signs bill pushing ‘complete streets’ planning

By Alex Nieves | 09/27/2024 04:19 PM EDT

The legislation comes as Caltrans faces criticism for not following its own policies on building walking, biking and transit infrastructure.

Bicyclists and pedestrians walk or ride on the Golden Gate Bridge in San Francisco, Wednesday, Aug. 3, 2011. Golden Gate Bridge officials have skirted a smashup over proposed bicycle speed limits by putting up new signs and creating separate lanes across the famous span to keep the peace between pedestrians and cyclists forced to share the bridge's one remaining open sidewalk. Beginning this week, the new signs on lamp posts and yellow road striping split the east sidewalk into one lane for pedestrians and another for bikers. (AP Photo/Paul Sakuma)

Walking and biking advocates have argued that Caltrans is not following its own policy on building nondriving infrastructure. AP

Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom signed a bill Friday that requires California transportation officials to strengthen their rules for building crosswalks, bus lanes, bus islands and public transit infrastructure when repairing roads.

S.B. 960, from state Sen. Scott Wiener (D), mandates the California Department of Transportation develop four-year targets for including nondriving — or “complete streets” — infrastructure in projects financed with state highway funds, and include pedestrian and bicyclist policy in their overall management plans.

State regulations already require Caltrans to prioritize nondriving infrastructure in projects financed with state highway funds. That policy stemmed from a 2019 executive order from Newsom directing it to include walking and biking infrastructure “where appropriate and feasible.”

Advertisement

Walking and biking advocates have argued that Caltrans is not following that policy, pointing to a March report that only 45 percent of ongoing projects included nondriving — or “complete streets” — infrastructure. California’s bicycle lobby has also accused the agency of inflating those numbers by including federally required disability ramps in its calculations.

GET FULL ACCESS